way to go, Phil! Conald Grump = Satan Clawz.

Get stuffed. Ahil Blexander

Now let Phil Alexander use his free speech please.

Hey BAD, good to see you around :-)

Eel - It is kinda sad (in a hilarious sort of way) that there are still people who think Trump cares about anything except himself, that he has even a fraction of the brainpower needed to do the job of president; that he isn't guilty of a huge swathe of criminal behaviour (even when his own words are an admission of guilt); hell, some of them even still think he's a billionaire, even as he skims from his own charity and PAC to pay his legal fees.

But hey, who am I to talk?

I still believe that Biden's exceedingly unpopular far-left regime was legitimately elected, that he cares about anything except himself, that he has even a fraction of the brainpower needed to do the job of president; that he isn't guilty of a huge swathe of criminal behaviour (even when his own words are an admission of guilt); hell, I even still believe that everything anyone says against him is Russian misinformation, like the claim that he's committing war crimes by sending illegal cluster munitions to Ukraine because it's losing to Putin and it and its allies are nearly out of ammunition.

It's funny how Trump supporting types post pretending to be me: they obviously think it gives their posts more gravitas and credibility than using their own names, which they seem *far* too cowardly to do.

Of course Biden was legitimately elected. If there were even a scintilla of evidence to the contrary, someone would have pointed it out by now. Instead, what you've done is show how poor your critical thinking is by making wildly stupid statements about impropriety with absolutely nothing to back it up.

It's funny how impossible it is for us leftard liars with sleepy Joe's diaper gravy dripping down our chins to see and hear the truth with our eyes shut and our fingers plugged in our ears.

Of course the P.O.S. illegal White House occupant Biden was never legitimately elected. People have repeatedly pointed out to me the mountains of proof that Biden's string-pullers had millions of fabricated ballots dumped into counting machines in the far-left Democrat-run major cities of six swing states early in the morning AFTER election day to steal it from the rightfully re-elected Trump. All I have to do to "refute" these proofs is to shut my eyes, plug my ears, and recite the election thieves' B.S. narratives pretending that Biden-rimming Big Tech's censorship of these volumnious proofs and the treasonous judges' refusals even to allow these proofs to be presented in court amounts to discrediting them.

By the way: Putin is totally getting his аѕѕ kicked in the Ukraine. That's what all the misinformation-free mainstream outlets say, so it has to be true. All those claims about the counter-offensive failing and the Ukraine and its cronies in NATO running so dangerously low on ammunition that Biden's now sending its troops "illegal" (Illegal according to whom? The UN? Don't make me laugh!) cluster munitions is just desperate propaganda from the alt-right wingnuts fellating Trump and his butt-buddy Putin.

There's no irrefutable proof that the 2020 election in the same way there's no "proof" that Solozzo killed Luca Brazzi with a garrote, or that Luca Brazzi put the head of a million dollar horse in Woltz's bed or that Tommy Devito killed Billy Batts. Of course not, the evidence was disappeared .......There is however, enormous circumstantial evidence pointing to it ..... Luca, a faithful hatchetman to Don Corleone for 30 years goes on a dangerous mission for the Don and just disappears? And then his vest shows up with a fish inside. Oh, that doesnt prove anything; maybe Luca himself did that so he could quit the life in favor of becoming a small town grocer ..... And that horse head showing up in Woltz's bed after he told the Don to f#ck off? Could have been a high school graduation prank. And Bill Batts disappearing hours after Tommy threatened his life. Oh come on, Tommy talks tough but never acts on it. Oh sure.

BTW, if you want to see every argument pro and con you can imagine about the 2020 election, check the thread to the parody "Counterfeit Biden" under my CML file. Its about 25 songs from the top. Its a complete debate. I made good points; Phil made good points. Decide for yourself

OK, so I think I've looked at every link provided as "proof" of election fraud. If you can't be bothered to read (which seems likely, as you obviously didn't read or check what the contents of those pages was actually saying), the TL;DR is - if this is the best you got, there was no fraud.

You know how I can state this with such certainty? Because I've looked at, read, checked and considered every link you supplied. And I am absolutely positive that you did not. It is this laziness, unwillingness to think and basic stupidity that is visible in every support of Trump's fraud claims which makes me pretty damn sure that it never happened.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/many-200000-wisconsin-residents-may-have-voted-absentee-without-having
- doesn't show fraud or even that it might have skewed the vote in any way at all. Doesn't even *suggest* that it might have affected the result.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/12/01/data_expert_up_to_300000_fake_people_voted_in_arizona_election_.html
- the video is unavailable; the article says he believes there was fraud, but he's hardly credible: he is also on record as believing QAnonsense. But critically: he didn't publish his data, or his methodology so this is equivalent to me saying "I've read lots on the internet, and have come to the conclusion that murples rule everything". If he had anything beyond fantasy, he could show his workings, but he hasn't.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MA8a2g6tTp0
- for someone who doesn't believe anything Biden says, who thinks he can't speak coherently at all, picking one thing and swearing it's truth is a little bit hypocritical, don't you think. Especially shorn of all context: do you have the rest of that?

https://www.newswars.com/what-are-they-hiding-detroit-absentee-counting-center-blocks-partisan-observers-from-monitoring-process/
A bit Betteridge's law-like: "what are they hiding?" the headline asks. The answer: nothing of any substance.

https://freebeacon.com/elections/nevada-sent-more-than-200k-mail-in-primary-ballots-to-wrong-addresses/
- and your point is? No fraud suggested or implied, nothing to say that anyone was trying to send registered Republicans' ballots to the wrong addresses, or that there was any thought behind selection of ballots to send out. Why did you even post this link? What do you think it shows?

https://thepostmillennial.com/trump-lawyer-lists-exhaustive-list-of-voting-infractions-in-georgia/
He lists a bunch of made-up numbers, presumably pulled rectally. This got laughed out of court. Literally. You really haven't done any checking on any of the links you've posted, have you?

CML refers to his "Counterfeit Biden" parody: http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/thebeatles3838.shtml where, if you look at the comments, you will see he has done exactly the same in throwing a lot of links none of which stand up and support his contention of a stolen election. He makes assertions of inaccuracy about fact-checking websites, yet does not cite a single example where they have been wrong about anything (let alone enough of a pattern to suggest that one can simply ignore their fact checking when it doesn't suit)

If you consider the above are the best proof of voter fraud, then that was probably the most secure election America has ever had.

Did I miss anything?

We're havin' some fun now, eh folks?

Fake Phil Alexander, you are an idiot.

At the risk of starting another gish gallop of meaningless links.. but the best that the dimwit pretending to be me could come up with a) most didn't even suggest fraud, of the two that did one was opinion from someone claimed as an expert yet failed to show his data or explain why and the other was a slip from a man they don't believe when he says literally anything else; b) the ones that did actually happen were not shown to be politically biased or affecting the outcome in any way, c) there was nothing posted which might have meant that the result of even a single state went the wrong way, let alone enough to change the overall winner.

CML - you're wrong, this isn't "lots of circumstantial indicators pointing towards fraud", there may be lots of opinion that way, but anything data-related is firmly unbiased, literally nothing to suggest that Biden was systematically getting more invalid votes than Trump. If you had a shred of intellectual honesty, you would admit that.

Not for nutin but I thought this was a site for song parodies not a facebook clone? am i right?

Hey real Phil. Glad you have the energy to challenge the idiots over here. Whenever I post accurate Trump stuff, I just take the 13 ones and don't argue. You can't win against the deranged.

Hey Rick - good to see you around :-)

It's not like it uses up a huge amount of mental effort, and I honestly would like to know why so many people are convinced the election was stolen: what I find hardest to credit is that there has been nothing which stands up to even the smallest bit of scrutiny to show fraud. As it comes out that all those around Trump were telling him he'd lost, and on more than a few occasions he has said that he lost, the repeated lie is ever more evident as the bluster of a toddler-brained narcissist who simply can't accept that millions more people voted for the other guy. That Trump has kept repeating the lie (to the point where he has probably convinced himself now) doesn't surprise me; but that so many people put *all* their critical faculties on hold and continue to believe this guy in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, does.

I guess it's not only Trump who is unable to admit to himself that he's wrong.

My theory is that it is no coincidence that people indoctrinated into religion at a young age are the most apt to believe any cult leader. Facts don't matter, it's "Faith". The churches have used this psychology for centuries, now far-right politicians are changing our county by the same crowd herding tactics. Good thing climate change is going to level the playing fields soon.