Ban 'em, Bannon! This is sarcastic, right? I mean, correct? If so, this is slightly funny. Anyway, please don't explain.

too many terrorists come in claiming to be refugees! better to stop 'em, than worry about which 3 out of 100 actually AREN'T planning to kill us! 455

^ Show me your numbers and sources for refugees committing terrorism in the U.S., Jonathan. You're hysterical and talking out of your hat. Vetting has been extremely effective re refugees. I can say glibly that Trump's E.O. ban resulted in the recruitment of 10,000 ISIS fighters, formerly comrades-in-arms with U.S. forces and translators and intel sources for them. Prove me wrong.

I also am taking this to be sarcastic, hope so. Seems like it

I should have put up a disclaimer!!! Of course I threw Bannon in there!

Besides, the terrorism in Europe had nothing to do with those refugees. In fact that was the result of not letting enough of them in.

Dude, you don't get it. All it takes is a few baddies to kill hundreds and your facts aren't completely true either. Interpol and European intelligence estimate hundreds of terror cells in Europe from many of the seven nations listed by Trump. And what of the European mass rapes committed by the refugees, the violence, the increase in crime? Have you even considered the violation of communities that don't want these people? Several states here in America don't want them either. We are nation of legal immigrant's historically. Who says we have to take in everyone from everywhere? The Syrians should fight their own civil war. Same for Central America. But no, Mexico allows them to pass right on through to our southern border to enter illegally. The Mexican Army provides directions to water stations and entry points. Did you know that, asswipe? Ask the Border Patrol and the citizens on the border. You Sir, are an ignoramus.

^ For "@JTF who should STFU," this is an excerpt from The Atlantic, Jan. 30, 2017:
The libertarian Cato Institute, has found that nationals of the seven countries singled out by Trump have killed zero people in terrorist attacks on U.S. soil between 1975 and 2015.

Zero.

Six Iranians, six Sudanese, two Somalis, two Iraqis, and one Yemeni have been convicted of attempting or executing terrorist attacks on U.S. soil during that 40-year time period. Zero Libyans and zero Syrians have been convicted of doing the same. “Foreign-born terrorism is a hazard,” the Cato researcher argues, “but it is manageable given the huge economic benefits of immigration and the small costs of terrorism.”
As for refugees, according to Cato, Trump’s action “is a response to a phantom menace.” Over the last four decades, 20 out of 3.25 million refugees welcomed to the United States have been convicted of attempting or committing terrorism on U.S. soil, and only three Americans have been killed in attacks committed by refugees—all by Cuban refugees in the 1970s.
Zero Americans have been killed by Syrian refugees in a terrorist attack in the United States.
No, we don't have to take in everyone from everywhere, but we have pledged protection to the world's tired and poor huddled masses yearning to breathe free, its wretched refuse and its homeless and tempest-tossed. Ms. Lazurus simply forgot to write, "the extremely vetted."
Btw, Emma should have excluded the foul-mouthed, intolerant, cowardly scum of the Earth, to account for wretched refuse like you!

https://www.google.com/amp/www.newsweek.com/how-isis-smuggles-terrorists-among-syrian-refugees-453039%3famp=1

It doesn't prove anything.