Once again you demonstrate the truth your left wing politicians will not admit: socialism is not motivated by love and compassion for the poor or less fortunate, but by hatred for the successful. It is not about opening opportunities but a desire to subjugate others. There is nothing in your platform for those who simply want to be left alone to pursue their own path. Except a platform with a rope and a trapdoor. Ruby Ridge and Waco are the end products of your philosophy and one need only look to Russia in the 1920's or Germany in the 1930's to see where totalitarianism leads. If you have time for a 1000-page novel, I recommend "Atlas Shrugged". Since you are a liberal, in the modern sense of the word, I'll ask you the ultimate question: if the government is going to tax everything I make, and give to those who can't or won't provide for themselves, why should I, or anyone else, work at all? At least in the above-ground economy. Soon you socialists will realise another important lesson: you can't steal something unless someone else produces it. I thank you again for your honesty, I only wish Obamapelosireid von Frankenstein had the cojones to admit as much in their public utterances.

Hey, I resemble those remarks! ;D (At least this "right-wing creep" doesn't one-bomb!)

"I'll ask you the ultimate question: if the government is going to tax everything I make, and give to those who can't or won't provide for themselves, why should I, or anyone else, work at all?"

Answer: Because the standard of living of those who work hard and make good money is TONS better than the standard of living of those on the dole.

Yes, the government taxes everything you (and I, and everyone else) make. But that doesn't mean they TAKE everything you make. If you truly believe that Obama/Liberals/Democrats want to take everything that everyone makes, you are delusional.

I'm a centrist/libertarian, voted democratic in 2004, 2006, and 2008, and I think you're nothing but a bitter jerk writing these scathing parodies. Let's not fight those who disagree with us, let's try to get along with each other whenever possible. I've heard that the country's 45% Republicans, 45% Democrats, and 10% undecided. It all depends on how the undecideds vote. And just because you vote for someone doesn't mean you agree everything the party says. I voted for Obama, because I thought we needed change and he was the better candidate. That's why a lot of people voted for him and his party in 2008. Who knows what will happen this fall though? Obama has a low approval rating, and that reflects on his party. People are disappointed because of not enough change. You continually act like everyone in the country still adores him. The main reasons people as a whole voted for Obama in the first place were to stop war, help the economy, and help control oil prices. You can't predict the future of how people will vote. The truly closedminded people are people like you who can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them. You're not funny, which is the point of this site. You just sit there churning out your completely unfunny stuff which is either offensive or over the top, depending on your point of view. Although I share a lot of your viewpoints, the way they're expressed offends me. Don't set out to offend. The only people who can truly like your "parodies" are jerks like you.

Patrick: Once again, you don't know the difference between liberalism and socialism. We don't hate "the successful," we hate much of what they do to become successful, i.e. do it on the backs of others. Ruby Ridge and Waco were started by right-wing gun nuts. They were murderers and they got what was coming to them. Ayn Rand was an ugly, selfish, adulterous hag, and a lousy writer to boot. If anything, YOU are the "socialist": You take what the working people produce, and give back minumum wage -- less if you can get away with it, which you no longer can. Your way has been rejected by the American people. And Blig: You're damn right I'm offensive, because I'm tired of playing defense against these right-wing creeps. You don't like it? I don't care. You know what we call "Democrats" like you? Republicans.

I'm definitely no Republican, as obvious by my voting record, but I don't believe in all out war between the parties like you obviously do. You must be one miserable bitter person, I'm sorry for you. I won't read your parodies any longer, and neither should anyone else.

One more note if you doubt my party affiliations: I turned 18 in 2004, so I've always voted democratic. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Why no insults and pergoritives for me? ;D

OMR, your parodies are crap. There's your insult :-)

I agree with Blig, you're just angry and cynical and have nothing better to do with your time than to lash out at those you hate.

"...sorer losers..."? Considering how Obama is still out on the stump, selling his "HC" plan and daring conservatives to overturn it, I'd say he's the biggest sore WINNER ever. BTW, instead of "nigh" you typed "night" thrice; must have been in a Rush to submit.

I've met Randy Weaver, several times. He was busted on a charge of having a shotgun a couple inches too short. The feds gave him the wrong court date. For that the feds spent a million dollars, shot his son in the back and blew his wife's head off while she was holding their baby. Randy never killed anyone. The Branch Davidians, and I have spoken to a survivor, didn't shoot until they were fired upon. Their crime was (?). Assuming they were abusing children, that was a job for Texas authorities, not the federal gun police. Who solved the abuse problem by burning the kids to death. Rand was a kook, true. She also had the psychology of the socialist nailed down. Don't stop writing. You are honest about what you believe. Unlike Congress, who hide their intentions in 2000 page documents more turgid than any Ayn Rand speech. See if you can justify that, preferably in verse. As Nancy Pelosi said, "Let's pass this thing so we can find out what's in it".

Hey ? - Thanks. I didn't think you guys loved me anymore. ;D

three cheers for Lord McLoad ! ! as he's loaded down with Cash/gold, & the Feds will soon be after him to lighten his 'load' . . .

HA! I'm hardly "loaded down," but I'm weathering the recession well. As I've said before, taxes are the price we pay for civilization, and I'm okay with paying my fair share to get it. Of course, what is "fair" is subject to debate.

Oh, yes, Lord McLoaded, you are indeed a Gent, Sir ! a modern Day RobinHood; You may wear my colors of Generosity & Compassion, Lord McLewd .

Talk about being a sore winner from political standpoints. If Obama's plan works out well then it can define him in a positive light, but if it fails...then at least it couldn't be worst than whatever Uwe Boll directed.

Your parody is too long, it's pathetic!

You gotta get home to a babysitter, Joe? McKludge: I wasn't aware you were Oliver Wendell Holmes... but he was right. Okay, humor's over. Patrick: You're a liar, the Weavers and the Koreshies both fired first. And Koresh was a child rapist who ordered the fires set himself. That you side with them makes you not quite as bad as they were, but bad enough. As our President has said, "America is better than that." About time you became better than that.

Stop making fun of my family!

Wait a minute. Koresh...the person you compared me to after I wrote my Nancy Pelosi parody? Shame, Mikey! ;D