NOT GUILTY. The Republicans HELD the majority, but they couldn't GET a majority to say he was guilty.

It doesn't means he was not guilty. It just means that the Republicans had no proof that Clinton's actions were a security risk, unlike Watergate. There is plenty of proof that he "did the deed".

Guilty as charged. While Clinton was busy staining Monica, he was also selling nuclear secrets to China, firing missiles at Aspirin factories and Iraqi shepherd boys, turning down an offer of Bin Laden's head on a platter, making a fraudulent deal with North Korea and--we know not what else, thanks to Sandy Berger the pants-stuffing document thief. Like everyone else in the Clinton Administration, Sandy Berger was a vandal and a crook who got off far too lightly for all his crimes. Nevertheless, in view of these crimes which we know are only the ones Clinton and his criminal cronies preferred to spin rather than to hide, we can only marvel at how dreadful the crimes on documented in those papers they managed to suppress so illegally must have been.

Hilarious album cover! 555

and yet, for all those supposed crimes, they all pale in comparison to what the current administration has done, lied to start wars killing hundreds of thousands, outing CIA agents, supressing science, illegal wire taps, torture camps, rape rooms. That's just the stuff we've heard about, and there's still two years to go. Incidently, your hero GW was the one who turned down the offer to receive Osama Bin Laden's head on the platter. He didn't want it to interfere with his revenge on Saddam

Wow. I never intended this to spark a debate. Actually, dude, all the claims about the weapons were true except the nuclear claims. Bush didn't "lie" about those; he was deceived by Israeli intelligence since the Israelis wanted us to go to war. The 17 resolutions by the UN violated by Saddam were no lie either. He hasn't "suppressed science" either, and that's not even a crime to do. Protecting embryos isn't suppressing science, it's suppressing genocide of the unborn (which is hypocritical, since abortion is still "legal".) The wire taps are of overseas calls into the US, not domestic wire taps from within. There's nothing illegal about tapping overseas calls. Also, anyone in the US who is not a US citizen is technically not even entitled to Constitutional rights anyway. The rape rooms were what Udday and Qussay Hussein were doing. The "torture" was not the result of Bush and Rumsfeld, but of the failure of Clinton's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. A female CO was put in charge of parts of Abu Ghraib that had a domestic history of bisexual sadomasochism, and her background was not put into consideration before putting her in charge of a prison. Clinton's turning down of the offer for Bin Laden's head on a platter is well-documented by a turncoat Clinton admin member, in his book "Dereliction of Duty." Bush's problem is not acting fast enough to fix Clintonian rape of government functionality. He is so concerned about catching the bad guy overseas, that he overlooks the nation's internal failures.