Making fun of music, one song at a time. Since the year 2000.
Check out the two amIright misheard lyrics books including one book devoted to misheard lyrics of the 1980s.
(Toggle Right Side Navigation)

Song Parodies -> "The Twelve Liberals We Should Toss"

Original Song Title:

"The Twelve Days of Christmas"

Original Performer:

Christmas Song

Parody Song Title:

"The Twelve Liberals We Should Toss"

Parody Written by:

Linda Terhune

The Lyrics

There are so many more to list, should have made it the 100 Liberals We Should Toss! Nothing wrong with Democrats, not the JFK "real" Democrats... but they are all gone and what's left are nuts with lots of nuts following them, what a shame...
The first liberal we should toss to get our country clean
that screaming nut case Howard Dean

The second liberal we should toss to get our country clean
Murdering drunk Teddy
and that screaming nut case Howard Dean

The third liberal we should toss to get our country clean
Wannabe Al Frankin
Loser drunk Teddy
and that screaming nut case Howard Dean

The forth liberal we should toss to get our country clean
Traitor Jane Fonda
Loser Al Frankin
Murdering drunk Teddy
and that screaming nut case Howard Dean

The fifth liberal we should toss to get our country clean
Cowardly Kerry
Traitor Jane Fonda
Loser Al Frankin
Murdering drunk Teddy
and that screaming nut case Howard Dean

The sixth liberal we should toss to get our country clean
Big arse Michael Moore
Cowardly Kerry
Traitor Jane Fonda
Loser Al Frankin
Murdering drunk Teddy
and that screaming nut case Howard Dean

The seventh liberal we should toss to get our country clean
Liar Bill Clinton
Big arse Michael Moore
Cowardly Kerry
Traitor Jane Fonda
Loser Al Frankin
Murdering drunk Teddy
and that screaming nut case Howard Dean

The eight liberal we should toss to get our country clean
Wench Hillary
Liar Bill Clinton
Big arse Michael Moore
Cowardly Kerry
Traitor Jane Fonda
Loser Al Frankin
Murdering drunk Teddy
and that screaming nut case Howard Dean

The ninth liberal we should toss to get our country clean
Weak Allan Colmes
Wench Hillary
Liar Bill Clinton
Big arse Michael Moore
Cowardly Kerry
Traitor Jane Fonda
Loser Al Frankin
Murdering drunk Teddy
and that screaming nut case Howard Dean

The tenth liberal we should toss to get our country clean
KKK's R. Byrd
Weak Allan Colmes
Wench Hillary
Liar Bill Clinton
Big arse Michael Moore
Cowardly Kerry
Traitor Jane Fonda
Loser Al Frankin
Murdering drunk Teddy
and that screaming nut case Howard Dean

The eleventh liberal we should toss to get our country clean
Psycho Al Gore
KKK's R. Byrd
Weak Allan Colmes
Wench Hillary
Liar Bill Clinton
Big arse Michael Moore
Cowardly Kerry
Traitor Jane Fonda
Loser Al Frankin
Murdering drunk Teddy
and that screaming nut case Howard Dean

The twelfth liberal we should toss to get our country clean
crooked Harry Reid
Psycho Al Gore
KKKs' R. Byrd
Weak Allan Colmes
Wench Hillary
Liar Bill Clinton
Big arse Michael Moore
Cowardly Kerry
Traitor Jane Fonda
Loser Al Frankin
Murdering drunk Teddy
and that screaming nut case Howard Dean

Your Vote & Comment Counts

The parody authors spend a lot of time writing parodies for the website and they appreciate feedback in the form of votes and comments. Please take some time to leave a comment below about this parody.

Place Your Vote

 LittleLots
Matches Pace of
Original Song: 
How Funny: 
Overall Score: 



In order for your vote to count, you need to hit the 'Place Your Vote' button.
 

Voting Results

 
Pacing: 3.1
How Funny: 3.0
Overall Rating: 3.0

Total Votes: 64

Voting Breakdown

The following represent how many people voted for each category.

    Pacing How Funny Overall Rating
 1   27
 30
 30
 
 2   4
 0
 1
 
 3   0
 2
 2
 
 4   2
 1
 0
 
 5   31
 31
 31
 

User Comments

Comments are subject to review, and can be removed by the administration of the site at any time and for any reason.

Darrell - July 30, 2005 - Report this comment
Coming soon to a FOX News promo near you.
Diddims - July 30, 2005 - Report this comment
Totally. Sounds like Bill O'Reilly (gag!)
Paul Robinson - July 31, 2005 - Report this comment
Yeah, Linda, what a shame the only people who make sense are those honest, forthright, upstanding paragons of candor and virtue - Extreme Right-Wing Republicans...who, by the way, have done such a marvelous job of making everything perfect since they took over control of all the branches of our Federal Government. So...just WHEN did you go off your Meds, anyway? Not voting because this parody mistakes "ludicrous" for "funny"...
Linda - July 31, 2005 - Report this comment
""""....honest, forthright, upstanding paragons of candor and virtue - Extreme Right-Wing Republicans"""" -----------Paul, I am glad you can see the truth, it's a start!-------
Graduate - August 01, 2005 - Report this comment
Koo koo kachoo, Mr. Robinson
Which one is the bigger idiot?
Heh heh heh!
The idiot, Mr. Robinson,
Or one who's beaten by an idiot?
Heh heh heh!
Heh heh heh!

Sucks to be you, Mr. Robinson. I notice you haven't been able to keep up all your posturing about "maturity" lately with all the whining brats and fruitcakes currently representing your party. Making things "perfect" is never a realistic political goal anyway, but I do have to say that making all you loser lefties go into total meltdown was quite the inspiring achievement by itself. I can think of a few things the Republicans could be doing better, but in our imperfect world, things really just don't get any better than this. You'd better go pop your prozac, Paul!

P.S. I know some of my Saturday Night Live tapes bill Michael Moore wannabe Al as "Al Frankin" but I think the name is usually spelled "Al Franken." Speling: anuther viktom uv tha publik edyookayshun sistum.
Paul Robinson - August 01, 2005 - Report this comment
Graduate - Frankly, I don't believe I am in need of any sedative or tranquilizer here...What appears obvious to me is that the Author of this piece wants to lump people of opposing political views into the same stew pot and then assign derogatory one-or-two word descriptions to each one(and repeated continually, as if some kind of mantra)...as if one can properly evaluate another human being's values, conduct and worth so easily...and then, just to make sure reader's know that her obsessive knee-jerk dislike of everyone with opposing points of view is understood, she implies that there are quite a few more folks she considers every bit as odious as those mentioned in her parody...and that all these people need to be "tossed"...whatever that is supposed to mean..."tossed" where, exactly? What, you want them ejected from the country? Or just silenced...removed from Public exchanges and appearances...I don't think my points here are indicative of someone who is over-reacting or out-of-control...I happen to think my points are rather perceptive and lucid. You might not like what I say or think, but I assure you that I am not out of control...While I did use a rather large dose of sarcasm in my comments - isn't sarcasm an accepted response to statements you consider ridiculous on their face? It is in my world. Contrast: Sarcasm, containing absolutely no infantile name-calling or direct insults versus you calling me an "idiot", implying that I am immature (yes, I have my moments..."Maturity" is, after all, an "Optional" feature in the human existance), and referring to Democratic Party representatives as "whining brats and fruitcakes". Yes, you do annoy me., but not much more than that...I don't have a problem either typing or expressing my thoughts, so it does not require that I be angered to pen a lengthy response or rebuttal. I like to make things clear about these matters...it often requires thought and detailed references...sorry if that bothers you...OH...as to the "Spelling" "P.S.", I do find it rather lame and particularly revealing that you lay the entire blame for the Author's mispelling of a name to the "publik edyookayshun sistum"...as if an Author has no responsibility or ability to properly research their work before submitting it. It really was not that big a deal in this parody piece, but since you brought it up I feel free to make that point in the service of "balance". Have a very nice day.
Alex - August 01, 2005 - Report this comment
oh please! What a bunch of whiners, typical Democrats! You go one and on and on as if anyone wants to read your long paragraphs of moaning. Where are you slicks when the parodies against the president are plastered all over this place? The story is different for you losers huh? Grow up, you lost, you can't handle it, you are losers and you can't handle that, wah wah wah!
Michael Pacholek - August 01, 2005 - Report this comment
Howard Dean: The ideal party chairman, since his rantings are no worse than various GOP chairmen over the years, and are at least funny. Ted Kennedy: You WISH you had a Senator like him, and what's worse, covering up an accident for nine hours or lying about an actual drunk-driving conviction for 24 years like Bush? Al Franken: Apparently, you can't handle his truth. Jane Fonda: Not a fan, but it's like Alan King said, she killed more people with that exercise video than in the war. Who kills American soldiers, a dumb actress who sits on a Vietnamese tank, or a dumb oil executive who sends 'em to die for a lie in Iraq? And which one has actually said "I'm sorry"? Not Bush. Michael Moore: Thinner than Gingrich and Henry Hyde, and courageous enough to tell the truth. Bill Clinton: If you're under 40, he's the best President of your lifetime. Hillary Clinton: Not a bad Senator. If she keeps this up, she just might be Presidential material. Alan Colmes: The most honest man on that show, or didn't you notice that "Hannity" doesn't just rhyme with "insanity"? Robert Byrd: Not one of my favorite people, but he recently admitted his shame. Trent Lott never admitted shame. Al Gore: Of all the adjectives you could have used to describe the man elected President in 2000 (and Al was), you chose "psycho"? Physician, heal thyself! Harry Reid: "Crooked"? Where the bloody hell did you get THAT? You better start working for universal health care, because clearly you need the treatment!
Alex - August 01, 2005 - Report this comment
Michael: What to expect from you, the immature little minded Bush hater? And who would want a drunken cold blooded murderer in their party? A KKK member? Give me a break! Two USA traitors! A comic who was so bad at the craft he tried politics with books even more immature than your songs! Hillary, who steals from the white house, has written NO BILLS as a senator, who cannot even keep track of any her husband's big 4 public affairs, (and thinks she can keep track of a country!), Two Revs, which make it okay to mix church and state and come out whining and running for president trying to be self important, the total idiot Kerry, (traitor), who nearly flunked out of Yale, refuses to release his discharge and med records from his "war hero service" (joke as that is) and has an IQ that only wishes it were higher than Bush's, Gore and Dean, both off their instable little rockers to an excess, they are comical they are so nuts! --- the list goes on and on and on... a sick dying party of sorted losers, oh yippie! No wonder your party has lost house and senate seats each year at record numbers, you all suck!
Alex - August 01, 2005 - Report this comment
PS Michael.... --------------------------------------------- Colmes is a sacrifial lamb, he is so stupid in a "duh" way, he is more a comic relief than a co-host of any threat!!! He does more for the Republican party than you know, people do not want to be associated with the slow one! --------------------------------------------- Hillary is a horrible senator! She stays away from iffy subjects (miles away) to keep herself moderate looking to the country. She has not written a single bill as Senator and New York is no better for having her, save the money she got for some of the 911 victims (helped some money come in for the families faster) and that's it!!! --------------------------------------------- Michael Moore has already been proven wrong in/for his entire 911 movie, or hadn't you heard? --------------------------------------------- You have no points, no arguements, no reason to be such a bitter little WRONG pill except pride over losing. That doesn't make you a great person, it makes you a weak one for not having the smarts to see your pride, get over it and think on your own... bah bah
Paul Robinson - August 02, 2005 - Report this comment
Alex, you absolutely stun me with your thorough and measured assessment and grasp of people and events, not to mention your tremendous talent for articulate commentary. I honestly don't care whether you like my "long paragraphs of moaning". Someone ELSE addressed a comment to me in a way I thought was rather immature and insulting, apparently with the intention of goading me into making a similar type of childish and juvenile remark. While I generally don't care what type of rubbish and nonsense foolish people of limited intellect want to believe or say, I do take exception to insults...I reserve the right to reply simply because I don't like to let garbage sit around unattended...it stinks and then draws creepy things...With that in mind I hereby relieve you of any obligation, real or imagined, to read any of my comments or reply to them. There, feel better now? Thanks.
Alex - August 02, 2005 - Report this comment
Paul ----------You think way to highly of yourself and your "real or imagined" intelligence and I fear that your superior mind cannot grasp that fact.
Alex - August 02, 2005 - Report this comment
Paul : """""""""""""""""""Alex, you absolutely stun me with your thorough and measured assessment and grasp of people and events, not to mention your tremendous talent for articulate commentary."""""""""""""""" --------Thank you, glad you are pleased-----------
Paul Robinson - August 02, 2005 - Report this comment
Alex, I don't really see any problem with my having a high opinion of myself as long as I'm managing to survive, pay my own way, put away a regular sum for my eventual retirement, if I happen to survive to that point, have adequate housing and food and do the things I enjoy doing. That seems to indicate I am more or less dealing well enough with reality. Which is kind of my way of saying that your opinion about my intelligent is of absolutely no use or value to me, or for that matter, to YOU...If you spend too much time dwelling on my "real or imagined" problem you might end up ignoring your own situation, whatever that might be...It doesn't matter one bit to me, but unless YOU are happy and pleased with all the aspects of your situation you really ought to direct more of your attention to whatever issues you might have. So, once again I hereby give you full permission to NOT worry or concern yourself about whether I have too high an opinion of my own intelligence. But, hey, that you so VERY much for your concern... I'm really touched you care so much...See? We can all get along...Well, gotta get back to the Income Tax Class I am teaching...say, Alex, do you know how to do an Income Tax Return? Just thought I'd mention it...if not, maybe you should try and learn, it's a good and useful way to use whatever extra or free time you might have on your hands...
Robert J. Pagliaro - August 02, 2005 - Report this comment
It is said that there aren't many liberals on the air because liberal talk shows aren't interesting. I believe we have now found the reason why there are no conservative comedians. Let's recap, shall we? Bill Clinton lied about consensual sex with another adult. George W. Bush lied about Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. Which lie hurt the most people? By the way, when are we going to get Osama?
Alex - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
Paul: oh goodness, your hypocrisy is showing! PS you sound as if you are about twelve and in reality, your opinion of yourself seems a bit more than what it should be. I can do taxes and have been able to do that for years now. You have a lot of time on your hands; maybe modesty courses would help you more than tax courses. I think if you attended a few modesty courses with someone who has a bit more maturity and who is a bit wiser than you are, (trust me, there are many out there), it could help you in some major ways. Just a few "friendly suggestions" for you... we are getting along well, aren’t we? -------------------------------------------------------------------------­----------------------------- To Robert: Yawn.
Alex - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
To: Robert J. Pagliaro -------------- . You really need to look up the word “recap” in the dictionary, you have no clue how to use it. I find it very humorous that you can only defend Bill Clinton from the whole list of 12! Just think, it your silly little thwarted value problem was fixed and reality set in, you would agree with all 12 of them! As for your question about Osama, I think he will be found just before the 2008 elections so a Republican can win! LOL! Actually, it’s a really stupid question, like I would know that! Finding a needle in a haystack can be tough. The better question is, why didn’t Clinton get him when the CIA had him and wanted to hand him to Clinton on a sliver platter? Clinton had him twice and the CIA had one of our 911 suicide guys under surveillance too! If not for his blunders, we would not have had 911 and lost all those innocent men, women and children " so think on that, (unless your head is too far up Michael Moore’s arse to see though all his shyt!)
Gwb suxx - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
All the people you mentioned are Democrats. I totally disagree with your content here.
Agrimorfee - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
I won't get into an argument about politics here. That's not what this website is for anyhow. I will state that this parody really could have been funny if the author tried harder...she (I assume by the name) could have been entertaining--even across partisan lines-- by following pacing and thinking of clever lines. Preaching to the converted, oh well.
Robert J. Pagliaro - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
Alex: Recap - summarize, which I did. Actually, your comment to me was much funnier than the parody - which I couldn't vote on by the way - I won't trash a parody by voting low just because I don't agree with it or just because it's wrong or even because it's just not funny. Actually, living and working in NYC, asking "where is Osama?" is a very intelligent question. That's all I ever wanted after we were attacked on 9/11. That's what your Republican dummy president promised us. Instead, he got Saddam - sorry, that just doesn't cut it for me. I hope the kool aid you drank was good - it looks like it was effective - afterall, you seem to have bought into all the right-wing lies. And you probably believe that Rick Santorum and his family handling of their dead baby was touching. "Piss off the Republicans, elect Hillary as President" bob
Royce Miller - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
Linda, I didn't read this right away but noticed all the comments; I agree with you. But Agrimorfee--"that's not what this website is for"....who are you trying to kid? Let's not forget that William Tong virtually monopolized this website for a long time, with only political parodies, and that set a precedent. The rest of us have every right to chime in, unless there's a firm ruling about no politics. Bravo, Linda.
Linda - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
gwb, Sure, they are all democrats, and you point is? The facts remain, they are traitors, cowards, theifs, liars, cold blooded killers and drunks, KKK members, crooks and screaming nut cases. Just because they are all democrats doesn't make the content wrong - it just means you do not like the truths in the parody.
Robert J. Pagliaro - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
Alex, I thought you were talking about democrats, not the entire republican party - please accept my apology. And speaking of looking up words, can't seem to locate "theifs" in my dictionary. My guess is that you meant "thieves".
Agrimorfee - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
JFtR, I have no objection to political parodies. I object to political parodies that have no style or substance.
Paul Robinson - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
Alex, you are repetitous and boring and I find I now grow quite tired of you...Good day...over & out...Oh, one more thing and then I am out of this thread... I agree with Agrimorfee completely...in retrospect I probably should have stated my opinion in the manner he just did...briefly and simply...but it goes against my personal tendency to be somewhat windy...I am aware of it...reader's can deal with it or not.
Robert J. Pagliaro - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
If we're talking about killers, why isn't Laura Bush (responsible for a fatal car accident) or Dubya (responsible for the thousands of deaths around the world, not to mention deaths of Americans) mentioned here? Oh, right, because they're republicans; they wrap themselves in the flag; they sing "God Bless America" during the 7th Inning stretch; they recite the "Pledge Allegiance" and pray in school. I'm sorry, never mind. Alex, I pose the question again: Bill Clinton lied about consensual sex with another adult. George W. Bush lied about Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. Which lie hurt the most people?
Paul Robinson - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
I really meant to be totally out of here...I am, at least for Alex...but I have one more comment, however...for Linda, I did not read your latest post here from 10:39 am this morning...Just one question...Do you seriously believe this is truly a "FACTUAL" statement? Here is your quote: "The facts remain, they are traitors, cowards, theifs, liars, cold blooded killers and drunks, KKK members, crooks and screaming nut cases. Just because they are all democrats doesn't make the content wrong - it just means you do not like the truths in the parody. " Come on, Lady...you need to be a little less free about tossing around terms like "traitor" at decorated War Veterans...by doing this you are questioning the integrity of ALL such veterans by suggesting that the process can be gamed and lacks integrity. If you mean that you ought to be ashamed. I don't know what crackerjack box or fortune cookie you get your "truth" from, but whatever it is you ought to change brands. OK, NOW I am done here, 'bye...
Alex - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
Robert, The WMD matter is tired and old. Information from intelligence, Germany, Russia etc., were all pointing to WMD, that is what he used, and it was not a lie. You are merely stuck on a good propaganda angle that you seem to like " like a thread of information that feeds your sorry ego and helps you keep your sore loser pride hidden. Again, that just makes you a weak person and ignorant to boot, not one with a point of any merit. Kerry, who bragged about telling Clinton to attack Iraq because of the WMD, does not bother you or the fact that Clinton, Mr. Hit and Run War Man, bombed Iraq does not bother you, which is selective history on your part and not very impressive. Just hang on to your herder's original story, (which they have even given up on), and you can remain the sheep, the follower, the bitter little mess you apparently are comfortable being. … PS Kennedy killed a woman and then ran and hid like the cowardly imp he is. Brining up a very different situation with completely different circumstances does not make your hero Kennedy, the drunken killer, untrue. Face it, many sore losing idiots build up your party and you just cannot stand it. Thank the God your party does not believe in that the Democrat party is a dying one... sucker.
Alex - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
Paul : Gosh, it breaks my heart to know you are tired of me. I was so hoping to be best friends too! One cannot get enough baby killing socialist sheep who cannot think on their own as friends!
Robert J. Pagliaro - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
Alex: I admire your desire and hardwork to locate and then spend time on this site. Are you employed to spread the word in this fashion? If not, you might want to consider it - your rhetoric is beautiful - hell, you could even make the McLaughlin Group more entertaining - and that rivals the preachers for the best comedy on Sunday morning in my book. And I'm serious here = you're great. I do hope you've taken the time to read some of my work and eagerly await your critique. Allow me to thank you in advance if you should take the time to do so. Come on, be honest, did you at least chuckle? Somehow I kind of think that if the guy who really won the 2000 election were in office, there wouldn't be a 9/11 to talk about; but what does this lefty know? I can't possibly express to you how 9/11 affected my life. And with all due respect, you couldn't possibly understand (as demonstrated by your writings) I withdraw. Good luck, bob
Linda - August 03, 2005 - Report this comment
to paul """"""""" Come on, Lady...you need to be a little less free about tossing around terms like "traitor" at decorated War Veterans...""""""" I think you misread the traitor truth. I did not say decorated war veteranS were traitors, I said Kerry was/is a traitor. I am so sorry that you do not like that fact and want to be a drama queeny and make it "all decorated war veterans", but that is your problem, get help in facing reality if you need to. I know these things can be confusing, so why not hop over to communist Nam and see Kerry's photo with the communist Nam leaders, shaking hands and read the reason the photo is up in the museum. You will find that they are thanking Kerry and they call him a war hero for communist Nam in their fight against the United States of America, (or you could just do a bit of research and find those facts and documents AND photos - but somehow I do not think you would even bother, maybe you can find Kerry and have a bbq with him, share some, keep the fire hot with some burning US flags!). To answer your question, "of course, I know those things to be fact and if you do not, you are spending way too much time with your head burried under the sand, come up for air" By the way, your sarcastic "fortune cookie" "cracker jack" comments really do not show your facts to be true or your points to be valid. Just because you can say these silly things doesn't mean you should go ahead and try to use them to make your posts look more credible or the person you are attacking more unworthy. There are none so blind as he who will not see.
Alex - August 04, 2005 - Report this comment
Robert; I am not employed to spread rhetoric and I did not know there was a market for it. I appreciate your comments and now wonder if you would be interested in becoming my agent. I would love to make money correcting the politically correct and would gladly give you your fair cut of the profits should you accept. In the meantime, “rhetoric” is just a hobby. ----------- I am proud of myself in that I figured out how to find your contributions on this site and have randomly read a few of them. I was both curious and disappointed that you chose to block the ability for people to comment on your parodies. ----------- The “guy” who really won the 2000 election, is in office now. Do you honestly think that very tired propaganda is true, or are you simply kidding around? In any event, to entertain your fairytale, I will say that had Gore won that election there may not be anyone left to talk about it rather than your idea “there wouldn’t be a 9/11 to talk about”. ------- To answer your question regarding what a lefty knows, I would have to respond by saying, “a lefty knows what his or her herders have told him”. ------- Finally, I claim defeat concerning your last sentence or two. I have no idea what you are talking about " sorry.
Robert J. Pagliaro - August 04, 2005 - Report this comment
Alex: You'll just have to trust me on this one,. the "comments off" was truly inadvertent on my part - the toggle use to be to "enable" comments - not being away of this when I submitted a few, the parodies were posted without the capability to accept comments; again this was not intentional. (Hey, I have a bit of an ego too.) But I'm disappointed that you didn't chose to comment on those that allowed comments - or did I miss your wonderful rhetoric. Finally, regarding your last line, I'm saddened that you cannot at least sympathize with what we went through, what we're going through and what we will go through; on the other hand, I'm glad you too don't have to suffer through it - trust me, it's not a good feeling. Good luck in your quest to be the next Pat Buchanan/Ann Coulter (what the hell does Bill Maher see in her anyway?) Peace bob
Random Reader - August 04, 2005 - Report this comment
wow, alex is proud cause he figured out all by himself how to find an author's contributions. I think all the people in this thread are stupid but the author is really extra weird. alex is the next weirdest but you are all stupid.
Alex - August 04, 2005 - Report this comment
To Random Reader - One would think that if you were to post about others being stupid, you would know how to spell "because" and not mistake it for "cause" which is more like "reason" i.e., "cause and effect", but whatever floats your remedial boat.
Alex - August 04, 2005 - Report this comment
To Robert; Direct me to whichever parody or parodies you want me to critique (and that allow comments) and I will happily do so, it is kind of fun truth be told. --- I do “trust you on that” by the way! ---- As far as my comment on your last sentence or two, it was not that I did not understand where you were coming from, it is more that I did not, (and don’t) understand the sentence itself, sorry.
john ulvang - August 08, 2005 - Report this comment
provocative!
Vic - November 15, 2005 - Report this comment
The 12 Brain Cells Linda Should Toss
Linda - April 23, 2006 - Report this comment
Oh gosh Vic, I missed you comment, ----- so sorry! --- you wrote, " " " The 12 Brain Cells Linda Should Toss " " " ---- ---- I have to just assume that was a question, because it did not seem like a statement, you know, the way it was written. So heck, better late than never! I would have to say, (giving equal numbers of folk in office, not in office & those "lower than life form" far left whackos in here), I would break it down like this: == == == > I would toss the brain cell that makes up Harry Reid's mind - prob. because it can't see to be honest, and that is not a good thing! Then I would say Hillary's, Dean's, Kennedy's and Boxer's one cell that makes up their brains.... I chose them because they could prob. be honest if they wanted to, but they obviously do not want to be! And since they've already tossed out ethics and morals, they hardly won't miss the specks that make up their brains at all, (so its sort of humane). Then there is McKinney, she should have her cell removed too, she is just too hostile. The good thing is that she won't even suspect me because she and I have never met and she has that automatic 'blame racist America' thing going on, so I'm safe there! For some non-political figures, I think good old Babs can lose her one cell making up her mind, after all, she has had all these super expensive "LAST Concerts" and basically ripped people off big time by faking them out with her "last - last - last" concerts etc., and again, that's just wrong! It is a nice person to pick too, for that same sort of humane reason too - because when they catch her for her financial fraud, not having a brain will keep her in bliss while she's in jail. And I don't think that Billy boy will be able to have her come over and play 'white house aide' games with him anymore, Hillary is on to her, so she would be in a terrible way if she were not chosen! Next, Baldwin the bragger, he should not even be here, he is one of them who swore that he would move the heck out of the country if Bush won! (and the liar did not, of course, lying runs in the party) That's prob. why more people voted for Bush than any other elected president EVER - just so the guy would friggin move already and he still did not take the hint! --- --- --- -- In this place, I would have started out with that Immoral Liberal dude, but he doesn't appear to have any brain cells to toss, not even one! I suspect he has a half or more like a quarter, and really, he's his own worse enemy and will suffer a great deal in life already w/his apparent disability, so I haven't the heart to pick him! I think we can safely toss Carol's too, I think it is no big deal because frankly, I believe that a bunch of drunken truckers took over her cell or bumped it out and put their collective cell in her head, (have you heard her mouth? eeee-gads!) Even though Michael is a blooming idiot sometimes, I think he has potential if he gets some exorcist action going on! He sticks to his guns, even if they are the wrong guns and are in reality squirt guns, he has some control over his outbursts and emotions - can't really say the same for most of the other led, fed, dems in here! You know, this is enough, no need for more. Variety is the spice of life and it would be no fun to have all the weaker minds gone. After all, where would I get my comedy relief if not from them, you know? Thanks for asking, it has been fun!
Immoral Liberal - April 24, 2006 - Report this comment
For those of us who just don't have the desire nor the energy to read the drivel of Terhune, her above post probably said something like this: "Michael Pacholek you just your head up the arse of the sheppherd in your baby killing, pedophile like flock of sheep. You demoncrat who isn't SMART enough to . . ." or demoncrats, pedophiles, baby killers, flock of sheep, etc. Death to demoncrats.
Patriot - April 24, 2006 - Report this comment
Is Rick Santorum still passing his dead baby around town? Now there is a compassionate conservative "hey voters, come and see my dead baby." Of course then there's Bill Frist - wasn't he the guy who could tell, from pictures, that the women in a 10-year coma was responding? Tom Delay the crook. Bush the dunce. Rumsfeld is like Satan come to life. Terhune is a loon. Where is Osama? Where is Osama? Where is Osama?
LucidLupin - April 24, 2006 - Report this comment
Do you hear voices as well?
Linda - August 01, 2006 - Report this comment
I write a parody and people who just cannot 'stand it' (the truth), still comment over a year later... what sorry little twirps
Immoral Liberal - August 01, 2006 - Report this comment
Speaking of twerps you nut case. If you ever wrote the truth then we might have an opportunity to not "stand it". However, as pointed out by many astute Americans on one of your other attempts at writing, you lied about Hillary Clinton. By the way, congratulations on your idol Mel Gibson - the passion was just oozing out of his mouth the other night, wasn't it?
LucidLupin - August 01, 2006 - Report this comment
Linda, the inside of your head is calling you.
It is time - August 02, 2006 - Report this comment
LucidLupin says; " " Linda, the inside of your head is calling you " " and that is a post I could not resist. Do tell Lucid, how would you know that?
LucidLupin - August 02, 2006 - Report this comment
Because it didn't make a sound.
Immoral Liberal - August 04, 2006 - Report this comment
That's pretty funny LucidLupin.
linda - September 03, 2006 - Report this comment
Gosh, I don't even need to post to prove how immature and silly liberals are... I just sit back and watch the freakish little radical nuts post all their nonsense and prove it all themselves.. very funny, I love it!
Gwb suxx - February 18, 2007 - Report this comment
Still...any parody that supports republicains and bashes demacrats does not get high votes from me. Republicains screw things up.
Dana - March 02, 2008 - Report this comment
I only today came across this posting, forgive my tardy entry. While I enjoy satire and parody. It can sometimes be silly to stress a point, hell it can be ludicrous to stress a point. One must wonder however if the combination of silly and ludicrous and just deep seated anger with plain mean spirit multiplied by immaturity has the similar effect of too much salt or too much sugar. While neither party has a corner on disturbed fringe members I don't have 'liberals' knocking on my door about religion. I haven't had a 'liberal' harangue me about getting or not getting an abortion. I have also not had 'liberals' avoid answers(except those with a childish axe to grind akin to this " alledged 'writer' claims, is her idea of a parody) to questions with childishness and name calling. Although it is easy for anyone to get down to Linda's level we should all try to stop and think and look for answers and let bad poetry/prose/writing die its natural death. Linda and those of her ilk, be they left or right, do not deserve a response that would dignify them in their own small minds.
Immoral Liberal - March 03, 2008 - Report this comment
Well said Dana. And with that we bury Ms. Terhune and her attempts at parody writing. Good riddance and may ye rest in peace
Linda T - March 06, 2008 - Report this comment
Immoral - glad to see you here, I guess you are just too hooked on my parodies to stay away - you visit them often & drop notes by months or years after they are written - I am so touched! Pardon me if I don't give your opinions much merit - you know - cuz you praise those vulgar left-wing crazed name-calling childish political parodies like you are in awe of their talent and in love with the authors… and then you bash the few that are from a right wing author – parodies that actually thought out well, have more than the OS lyrics with some name calling pasted in... – now those, those are worth attacking huh? Nah…. It’s just that your taste is not the best - not credible and really, not valuable to me -- I hope you understand - your past of personal attacks in the attempt to shut me up -- well, they just proved to me over time that my original thoughts that you are a bully without substance, a bashing little boy without values and a thug - were true all along. And the fact that it seemed that you would never grow out of your hypocrisy and schoolyard bully mentality has also been proven to be true. So again, sorry your thoughts are of no value - but really, can't blame me for feeling that way - you've given lots of reasons for me to! 

The author of the parody has authorized comments, and wants YOUR feedback.

Link To This Page

The address of this page is: http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/christmassong2.shtml For help, see the examples of how to link to this page.

This is view # 2569