Best parody EVER!

Yeah, plenty of shіt here for all of us to eat!

Let me play Nostradamus for a while here and be the first to predict the next round of this never ending soap opera - one or more jurors are gonna come out (probably anonymous at first) stating they voted "guilty" because they feared they themselves and their families would be in danger if they didn't. That won't necessarily mean such a statement is true (though it is likely, and I sure would have if I were one of them), but the first to say it will be able to negotiate for a substantial book and movie deal with Hollywood.

Jackpot!

Jurors had and have a reason to fear their guilty votes,, because the magaTs are the thugs. Cheers for their bravery.

This is weird.. someone pretending to be me making such a banal comment?

Peter - Ya think jurors might have been scared into voting "guilty"? Based on the evidence presented & the law as explained, I can't see any other verdict was possible.

Interestingly enough, Allan Dershowitz, longtime Proffessor Emeritus of Con Law at Harvard Law which has been THE pre-eminent Law School in the USA since that unfortunate dust up with the British Crown 3 centuries ago ... Well, HE said he observed more reversible error in the one day he attended the trial than he had in the rest of his career. In other words it was the greatest legal travesty he had ever witnessed .. by far. OTOH, if a stand up comedian from England has a diametrically opposed opinion ...

In a way, Phil is right, Trump is guilty .. in the same way that defendants in Stalin's show trials conducted by Lavrentiy Beria were guilty. If you take a fine toothed comb to a person life and finally find something a little hinky, and then create a Law solely for that person, you can find anyone guilty of something. That's why Lavrentiy had a 100% conviction rate. He'll, the British Crown used to pull that stunt all the time. It was called a Bill of Attainter

CML - what law was created? None at all. Which of these do you think are made up?

1 That Trump had sex with Stormy Daniels?
2 That he paid her off through Michael Cohen to stay silent?
3 That the records of him reimbursing Cohen were falsified?
4 That the motive behind it was to prevent his popularity in the polls from falling?
5 That because the motive was electoral and not personal, this consititutes election fraud?
6 The statute used to tie the state crime to the electoral one, thus making it a felony?

If all of the above steps have been shown to be the case, then of course he should be found guilty of the crimes described. So which of the above are you claiming was/where sheer invention?

Don't forget that Cohen was sentenced to three years for his part in it - who was shouting "witch hunt" at that point? If you (like Trump himself) weren't claiming a witch hunt for the Cohen trial, don't you think it's a little hypocritical to be doing so for Trump?

As you well know, P.A. Trump was convicted of NONE of "charges" you listed (many of which aren't even charges as they weren't even illegal at the time). The reason the Biden-rimming DemoKKKrat traitor Juan Merchan (who refused to recuse himself from the case despite his blatant conflict of interest) had to give the treasonous cowards on that jury an absurd 55-page "road map" of BS un-Constutitonal instructions to get Trump "convicted" was because those jurors couldn't unanimously agree he was guilty of ANY of the individual charges against him; and as our country's Supreme Court has firmly established in case after case, conviction on ANY charge whatsoever requires a UNANIMOUS "guilty" vote from the jury. So Merchan illegally "bundled" the charges together and illegally instructed the jurors to vote Trump COLLECTIVELY guilty of all charges if they agreed he was guilty of any INDIVIDUAL charge.

Gloat about these false "convictions" at these Stalinist show trials while you can, P.A., because all you lawless seditious treasonous un-American vermin have accomplished with your soon-to-be-overturned-on-appeal "verdicts" is to galvanize America's patriots against you Biden-rimming fascists and flood Trump's re-election campaign with millions of vocal supporters and hundreds of millions of dollars of financial support; and when we take back the country from the election thieves, it's payback time for all you enemies of the U.S.A. (domestic and foreign) with your tongues up the illegal unelected Biden Regime's bung.

I wasn't listing charges, I described the actions which led to charges being brought, and based on the evidence given in court, proven beyond reasonable doubt. I get it that your view of those charges is unreasonable, and no amount of evidence would ever change your mind. You live in your fantasy world where Trump is some kind of honest patriot put upon by treasonous Democrats, I'll stick to reality.

Nope; you're the delusion-dwelling Biden-rimmer trying to present the treasonous Biden-rimming DemoKKKrats' Stalinist show trial against Trump as legitimate rather than the insult to kangaroos it would be to call it a kangaroo court. I get that you Biden-rimming delusion-dwellers have your heads so far up the illegal unelected Biden Regime's rectum that you don't even know how to read, but if anyone the least bit legally literate with an actual working mind (which necessarily excludes you, P.A.) happens to be reading this, here's a little article from legal expert Jonathan Turley explaining just a FEW of the fatal flaws in this Stalinist show trial that render it absolutely illegitimate: (In particular, pay attention to what he says about "New York’s election law 17-152" which COMPLETELY invalidates points #5 and #6 on P.A.'s B.S. list):

https://jonathanturley.org/2024/06/03/buzz-kill-the-trump-conviction-presents-a-target-rich-environment-for-appeal/

"Biden-rimmer"? Even your puerile attempts at insults are delusional. Seriously, grow up and start thinking.

Just read that article, and it doesn't invalidate *any* of the points above; there's grounds for appeal re #6. But if that's all you're complaining about, you're presumably agreeing that Trump knowingly falsified business records to cover up hush money payments. He so very narrowly won in 2016 (especially considering he polled millions of votes less than Clinton) that the illegal cover-up probably did change the course of US & world history. It's not something minor to be overlooked.

Trump's defence was awful, mainly because Trump's too much of a whiny baby to allow his own side to admit to anything negative about him. It's sad that this self-absorbed narcissistic moron has managed to accrete so many slavish, deluded followers.

MAGA you so stupid.

I think because of the large amounts of money on stake with book and movie deals for anyone these days that has been involved in something that grabbed the public attention we'll pretty soon get to hear at least TWO kinds of juror retractions playing it up for drama (but unless they are backed up again in the future by deathbed confessions there will be no way to know for sure if those retractions really are true). One or several SOMEONES will come out saying they felt pressured to vote "guilty", and then the Trump side will play that up as if that pressure came down hard from the court officials (and maybe it did, or maybe they just imagined, it makes no difference to what happens next even though those two reasons are totally different). Also, let's not forget that jurors feeling pressured to adjust their opinion is a rather normal thing in every single circumstance where the first vote or rounds of round-table opinion taking indicate that there is a 11-1 or 10-2 majority already in the air. That's a juror system by design, the majority slowly pressuring the minority into siding with a verdict (OR the minority swing the majority around to something that only a few saw at first). My point is that a court decision on a celebrity these days, any big celebrity, are never really the end of procedings, it's just a diffent kind of starting point for the next money making phase. So you might wanna prepare parody ideas to songs with "round and round" in the title or the chorus. :-)

I have to get in on this - because noone and I mean NOONE - deserves 325 votes of 111 - even when I don't agree with him/her on the qualities (or non-qualities) of Trump. Come on people! What happened to the old days of parody writing when both sides could appreciate the effort of the other?

I love you Phil Alexander and Peter Andersson!

Likewise!

Read, if you have the ability. https://time.com/6985532/trump-conviction-myths-debunked-essay/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0GEYdbiT77rGeO7pVYDkRe9Q5vIbw3J8Hoam1eduTw1dNUGaoMYe8VsUk_aem_AUzblLCPmYJl0JGovxOaIV3lc-TpBmop6X4oSAktZHEuZrzlheQ_rkzi6pRZk9viW2U_4OVMPVQacMOy8mNNmufD