Yep, just goes to show there's a stripper out there for everyone Paul - just gotta persevere into the early hours - and if she's still stripping at 63, she obviously has a passion (although maybe not anything else) for it - 555

You can get an AARP discount for a granny lap dance? Cant wait to turn 65 (lol)!! .... 555

63 year old women have wrinkles, but 65 year old men have poor eyesight, so it evens out, I imagine...

Grandpa... he's a porn star;
He's an internet cyber-stud!
Grandpa... he's a porn star;
Check out his little butt!

He's on Geritol...
Laced with viagra;
He's 88 years old!

I tried this very same topic to the tune of Fleetwood Mac's "Gypsy" which started out with -- So I'm back again at the granny porno site; Back to the crones that I love ... Didn't receive the love you're getting, Paul. not at all. So I guess the rule is: Granny working a stripper pole -- inside the lines; Granny as pornographic sex object -- a bridge too far (I see what I did there)

I know a lady who was a Playmate of the Month back in 1970 - she's one month older than me (I'm 68), and she still looks fantastic, at least with her clothes on. But since she was with someone else the only time I ever saw her naked was in the magazine pictorial.

With the "gray" part I can too well identify.

Hey there Paul, great to see you here again as well :) Well, I was swayin' with this one. It brought back some great old mammaries...5's LOL I liked yours better compared to ours. It's interesting, we took the turned off approach, you chose the other way!

Per, well the new (to me) rules about sexual subject matter kind of pushed me in this direction. However, once I decided on a positive direction I was happy with the results. And yes, I did peruse yours once I decided on the title - I wanted to make sure I was using a reasonably fresh approach. I'm still chaffing a bit about the rules because it puts a governor on my imagination by blocking out an entire category of subject matter, but I do understand the thinking behind them.

CML - You can actually join AARP at 50. In fact once they find out you have reached five-oh you will doubtless find yourself deluged with ARRP offers.

I'm well past 50 Paul, which means I sometimes confuse AARP-threshhold age and 93.3% Social Security entitlement age. So I guess what I'm trying to say is that I can't wait until my almost-100%-vested SS benefits will be able to fund my AARP-discounted granny lap dance .... or something. Work with me here.

CML - Well, at least that gives you something to look forward to.

Paul - can yo ugive me a link to these rules you speak of? Good thing for us they are not retrospective, I suspect!

Per, actually I just assumed that tighter rules were in effect these days because I haven't seen anything resembling a smutty piece since coming back around here several weeks ago (it had been over 10 yrs. since my last posting). Yeah, a retro purge of this site would leave a huge hollow hole in the archives. In my opinion the lack of sexually-oriented pieces must be at least part of the site's current low view hits counts.

There may be an unofficial backlash against this type of thing, judging from reactions to my last forays into this area. See my take on the Beatles' "Money" entitled "Cunny" and the reaction. Of course all the negative votes and comments might be attributed to a certain troll (or two) who plagued me for years. And check out the war of words between us. It's epic ...... And then check out "Dipstick" based on "Gypsy" That may be closer to a legitimate boundary. BTW, you'll have to go to the Performer's index to see these. I dont use my normal screen name ... because offspring

This parody is pretty tame. Your examples CML, yeah, they nearly push the limit just from my own standards (not to say that my standards are or should be AIR standards). Paul, I dug, this. 555.

She love you long time (as long as it's before 8 p.m.).

Ye Gods, CML, I had a read of the ones you listed. You are in some folks' gun sights... :(

@ Paul: I have it to be rather the other way around; since the demise of whatfreaks.com some years ago it's actually easier than before to get a borderline smut parody onto amiright. The general lack of 'em is probably more to do with that us oldtimers have already drained the subject back in the day, and that the millienial young'uns who have grown up with the internet and pop-up p*rn ads always lurking behind every click there doesn't find a good such joke/parody as much fun as we did when we were their age. Me, I still try to write a few ones every year, the one linked below would not have made the site ten years ago methinks:

http://www.amiright.com/parody/2010s/diabloswingorchestra2.shtml

You have a good point there, Peter.

Hmmm...I just took a little tour through my "Authors" page and discovered that several of my earlier postings have indeed been excised from the site. Kinda pissed me off. I did notice, however, that some of them weren't even sexual in the least, so maybe it was just through some kind of archiving glitch(??). Anyway, three of them in particular I can remember: Simon & Garfunkel's "Big, Bright Green Pleasure Measure", which I used to kind of tongue and cheek shill for Avril Lavigne, Buff. Springfield's "Uno Mundo", which I called "Ooh,Said Bluto", about a jealous Popeye punching Bluto in the face for hitting on Olive Oyl, and J.Taylor's "Carolina On My Mind", which WAS rather blue, being about an exotic dancer's openness regarding the display of her lady parts.

OK, I went over my page some more and am now reasonably certain that some type of archival glitch was responsible for my missing works. I remember posting several Simon/Garfunkel pieces within days of each other, and they are all missing and none of them would have had content issues. So there is/was no censorship conspiracy involved, just my paranoia taking a little romp in my cerebellum.