i heartily agree

You're right, and not just about the fact that I DKTOS. Which makes it hard to rate the song, but anything that rips Bill O'Really? gets a five from me.

Thanks, alvin, I thought you might...Michael, HP Lovecraft (the group) never got very well known. The put out two pretty good albums in the mid-60's, some very interesting stuff....Anyway, I appreciate your trusting me on the pacing...I recorded a voice overlay on the OS and I can tell you it matches up. O'Reilly? Yeah, whatta piece-a work, huh?

I happen to like a lot of things about O'Reily but It's funny to hear you hold him accountable. 5's

The only thing I like about O'Reilly is how his extreme patriotism effectively highlights the problems with neoconservatism. He's basically a parody of neoconservatism itself. The difference between him and Stephen Colbert is that Colbert is in on the joke, but O'Reilly expects people to take him seriously.... Whatever the case, good parody... 5-5-5

Bill is a jackass. I'm just wondering which end I should watch when he spews(oops I mean speaks) 5's

Well, Lionel, I hope we all recognize the importance of "accountability"...especially from someone posturing as being "fair and balanced". Macphisto - I'm not sure that "neo-conservatism is anything but a joke (a very bad and destructive one). It seems based on a set of facile but totally off-base assumptions about, well, most everything. It seems a weakly constructed plan for Empire that employs the reverse of the old and totally discredited "Domino Theory". Neither "Theory" takes into account internal ethnic and tribal conflicts or consider Nationalism to be of much significance. It's a "one-size fits all" view of troubled or under-developed regions of the world that just doesn't hold serious water. I'm not sure they even care much about REAL "Democracy" for anyone - they certainly went out of their way to work around it here to get "Their" War in Iraq, didn't they? But if they let on that it's about establishing "Empire" they would find most Americans totally put-off and opposed...I only know of a couple people in my entire existence who have thought it was important or of more advantage than dis-advantage to try establishing and MAINTAINING this type of control - it would have to be thru force, and I just don't think Americans want to pay enough in blood and treasure to accomplish this. I think the 'Neo-cons" ought to go back to playing "Stratego" or wherever the Hell they got their goofy ideas from. OH...using the term "neo-conservativsm" to describes these clowns (it was their choice, I think) is another joke...these are some of the most "Radical" folks you will ever see or hear of. Nothing "Conservative" about what they wanted (and still want) to do. Hmmm...how did I get started on this dissertation, anyway? Uh...anyway, thanks to you, too, carol...lol...and, yeah - O'Reilly IS a Jack-Ass.